Dr. Samuel Kiprono Langat
1
Prof. Grace Wanjiku Ndegwa
1
4
School of Education Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya
4
Faculty of Education and Social Sciences Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of students' linguistic proficiency on the effectiveness of biology instruction in Kenyan secondary schools. Given that English is the primary language of instruction in Kenya, students' command of the language plays a crucial role in their comprehension and engagement with scientific content. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected through standardized language and biology assessments, classroom observations, and teacher interviews across selected public schools. The findings reveal a strong correlation between linguistic competence and academic performance in biology, particularly in conceptual understanding, interpretation of scientific terminology, and engagement in classroom discourse. Teachers also reported difficulties in delivering content effectively when students exhibited limited language skills. The study concludes that language proficiency is a foundational factor in science learning and recommends targeted language support programs to improve science outcomes in multilingual contexts.
How to Cite
Dr. Samuel Kiprono Langat, & Prof. Grace Wanjiku Ndegwa. (2025). Linguistic Proficiency and Its Impact On Biology Instruction In Kenyan Secondary Schools. Frontiers in Emerging Multidisciplinary Sciences, 2(04), 1–5. Retrieved from https://irjernet.com/index.php/fems/article/view/64
📄Bal-Taştan, S., Davoudi, S., Masalimova, A., Bersanov, A., Kurbanov, R., Boiarchuk, A., & Pavlushin, A. (2018). The Impacts of Teacher’s Efficacy and Motivation on Student’s Academic Achievement in Science Education among Secondary and High School Students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2353-2366. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/89579
📄Hodson, D. (2020). Going beyond STS education: Building a curriculum for sociopolitical activism. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20, 592-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00114-6
📄Breiner, M., Harkness, S., Johnson, C., & Koehler, M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109
📄Kareem, A. (2018). The Use of Multimedia in Teaching Biology and its Impact on Students’ Learning Outcomes. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 9, 157-165.
📄Mardonov, Z. (2019). The Importance of Biological Education at School. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences Vol, 7(12), 909-911.
📄Trundle, C., & Saçkes, M. (2012). Science and Early Education. Handbook of early childhood education, 240, 258.
📄Larimore, A. (2020). Preschool science education: A vision for the future. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(6), 703-714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01033-9
📄Basil, J. (2021). Teacher’s Characteristics and Academic Performance of Biology Students in Secondary Schools in Calabar Municipality of Cross River State. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3796306
📄Himschoot, R. (2012). Student perception of relevance of Biology content to everyday life: A study in higher education Biology courses. Capella University.
📄Wieringa, N., Janssen, J., & Van Driel, H. (2011). Biology teachers designing context-based lessons for their classroom practice—the importance of rules-of-thumb. International Journal of Science Education, 33(17), 2437-2462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.553969
📄Maeng, L., & Bell, L. (2015). Differentiating science instruction: Secondary Science Teachers' Practices. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2065-2090. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1064553
📄Xiao, Y., Cai, Y., Ge, Q., & Yang, Y. (2023). The potential of using formative assessment to enhance academic achievement in the Confucian-heritage culture: A comparison between Hong Kong and Shanghai. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(6), 867-876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00702-0
📄Alvermann, E., & Wilson, A. (2011). Comprehension Strategy Instruction for Multimodal Texts in Science. Theory into Practice, 50(2), 116-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.558436
📄Ramadhanty, J., Meylani, V., & Hernawan, E. (2020). Analysis of Language Literacy Skills in Biological Learning Contexts. Bioeduscience, 4(2), 157-165.
📄Drubin, G., & Kellogg, R. (2012). English as the universal language of science: opportunities and challenges. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 23(8), 1399. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e12-02-0108
📄Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdes, G. (2013). Science and Language for English Language Learners In Relation to Next Generation Science Standards and With Implications for Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13480524
📄Thayamathy, P., Elango, P., & Karunarathna, K. (2018). Factors Affecting Academic Performances of Undergraduates: A Case Study with Third Year Science Undergraduate of Eastern University, Sri Lanka. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 25(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13480524
📄Hakorimana E., Oyebimpe A. & Andala H. (2020). English Language Skills and Students’ Academic Performance in Rwandan Public Secondary Schools: Case of Bugesera District. Journal of Education, 3(3), 35-43.
📄Tawfik, Y. (2017). Integrating Language and Content in Mainstream Biology Classrooms-The Experiences of English Language Learners. Master's Thesis, the American University in Cairo, Egypt.
📄Snow, E. (2010). Academic Language and the Challenge of Reading for Learning about Science. Science, 328(5977), 450-452. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182597
📄Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2013). Halliday's introduction to functional grammar. Routledge.
📄Oyekan, O. (2015). Teachers’ perception of correlates of students’ language competence and Achievement in Biology. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 2(1), 93-99.
📄Llamas, A., Vila, F., & Sanz, A. (2012). Mathematical skills in undergraduate students. A ten-year survey of a plant physiology course. Bioscience Education, 19(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.11120/beej.2012.19000006
📄Brewer, A., & Smith, D. (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate Biology education: a call to action. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, 5(81), 79-110.
📄Eastwood, K., Boyle, M., Williams, B., & Fairhall, R. (2011). Numeracy skills of nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 31(8), 815-818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.12.014
📄Karwitha, M. (2016). Modeling The Performance Of Science Subjects For Secondary Schools In Kenya Using Partial Least Squares Regression. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University Of Nairobi.
📄UNICEF (2021). Uncertain pathways: how gender shapes the experiences of children on move.
📄Van Laere, E., Aesaert, K., & van Braak, J. (2014). The Role of Students’ Home Language in Science Achievement: A multilevel approach. International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2772-2794. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.936327
📄Fang, Z., Lamme, L., & Pringle, M. (2010). Language and literacy in inquiry-based science classrooms, grades 3-8. 14-17 Corwin Press.
📄Parkinson, J. (2012). English for Science and Technology. The handbook of English for specific purposes, 155-173.
📄Feser, J., Vasaly, H., & Herrera, J. (2013). On the edge of mathematics and Biology integration: improving quantitative skills in undergraduate Biology education. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(2), 124-128. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-03-0057
📄Hadi-Tabassum, S., & Reardon, E. (2017). Bridging language and content for English language learners in the science classroom. Teaching Science to English Language Learners: Preparing Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers, 31-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53594-4_3
📄Dhillon, K., Wanjiru, J. (2013). Challenges and strategies for teachers and learners of English as a second language: The case of an urban primary school in Kenya. International Journal of English Linguistics, 3(2): 14-24.
📄Ferreira, G. (2011). Teaching Life Sciences to English second language learners: What do teachers do? South African Journal of Education, 31(1), 102-113. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v31n1a409
📄Ahmed, Z. (2017). Difficulties Encountered by EFL Students in Learning Pronunciation: A Case Study of Sudanese Higher Secondary Schools. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(4), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n4p75
📄Tella J., Indoshi F, Othuon L (2010). Relationship between Students’ Perspectives on the Secondary School English Curriculum and Their Academic Achievement in Kenya. Educational Research. 1(9), 390–395.
📄Ogembo, J., & Geteregechi, M. (2018). Influence of Language Skills on Students’ Learning and Achievement in Mathematics in Secondary Education in Kenya. Research Journal of Educational Studies and Review, 4(1), 6-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15535.07848
📄McLeod, A. (2014). Lev Vygotsky.
📄Vygotsky, S. (2012). Thought and language. MIT Press.
📄Abimbola, I. (2017). Theories of learning and their implications for biology teaching. Biology teaching methods. Ilorin: Haytee Press and Publishing Company Nigeria Ltd.
📄Lado, A., & Wright, A. (2017). Practical language learning strategies that increase science learning and engagement. Teaching Science to English Language Learners: Preparing Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers, 191-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53594-4_9