Frontiers in Emerging Multidisciplinary Sciences

Open Access Peer Review International
Open Access

Biogenic Recovery of Zinc Through Tolerant Bacterial Systems: Implications for Treatment of Manufacturing Wastewater

4 Department of Chemical Engineering, Pokhara University, Nepal

Abstract

The increasing discharge of zinc-containing effluents from manufacturing sectors such as electroplating, textile processing, and metal finishing has raised significant environmental and public health concerns. Conventional physicochemical treatment technologies, while effective under controlled conditions, often exhibit limitations including high operational costs, sludge generation, and reduced efficiency at low metal concentrations. In response to these challenges, biological approaches—particularly those employing metal-resistant bacterial systems—have emerged as sustainable and cost-effective alternatives for zinc remediation.

This study investigates the feasibility of biogenic zinc recovery using tolerance-enabled bacterial strains, focusing on their applicability in industrial wastewater treatment systems. The research integrates principles of microbial biosorption, bioaccumulation, and metabolic transformation, positioning resistant bacterial systems as viable tools for heavy metal removal. Theoretical frameworks related to wastewater treatment optimization, decentralized systems, and resource recovery are examined to contextualize the biological approach within broader environmental engineering strategies.

A comprehensive literature synthesis highlights the evolution of wastewater treatment technologies, emphasizing the transition from centralized treatment infrastructures toward integrated and decentralized systems that facilitate resource recovery (Capodaglio, 2017; Libralato et al., 2012). The role of advanced treatment techniques, including membrane systems and multi-criteria decision-making frameworks, is analyzed in comparison to biological remediation methods (Heller et al., 1998; Mahjouri et al., 2017). Particular attention is given to the microbial removal of zinc using resistant bacteria, demonstrating significant removal efficiencies and adaptability under varying environmental conditions (Pratap et al., 2022).

The methodological framework proposed in this study includes isolation and characterization of zinc-tolerant bacterial strains, optimization of operational parameters such as pH, temperature, and biomass concentration, and evaluation of biosorption kinetics and isotherms. Hypothetical case models are developed to assess the integration of biological systems within existing wastewater treatment networks.

Findings indicate that bacterial-mediated zinc removal offers high efficiency, scalability, and environmental compatibility. However, challenges related to process stability, biomass recovery, and industrial implementation remain critical considerations. The study concludes that biogenic zinc recovery represents a promising pathway toward sustainable wastewater management, aligning with global trends in resource recovery and circular economy practices.

How to Cite

Dr. Nabin Adhikari. (2024). Biogenic Recovery of Zinc Through Tolerant Bacterial Systems: Implications for Treatment of Manufacturing Wastewater. Frontiers in Emerging Multidisciplinary Sciences, 1(1), 46–53. Retrieved from https://irjernet.com/index.php/fems/article/view/387

References

📄 A. Capodaglio, “Integrated, Decentralized Wastewater Management for Resource Recovery in Rural and PeriUrban Areas,” Resources, vol. 6, no. 2. p. 22, 2017.
📄 S. Arslan, M. Eyvaz, E. Gürbulak, and E. Yüksel, “A Review of State-of-the-Art Technologies in Dye- Containing Wastewater Treatment - The Textile Industry Case,” in Textile Wastewater Treatment, 2016.
📄 T. Asano, F. Burton, L. Altos, H. Leverenz, R. Tsuchihashi, and G. Tchobanoglous, Water Reuse: issues, technologies and applications. United States of America : McGraw-Hill, 2007.
📄 Bian Guiguo, New Progress of Mechanism Research on Influence of Fluoride toHuman Body Health, Chemical Production and TechnologyVol.5, PP. 13-16, 2008.
📄 A. Castillo, P. Vall, M. Garrido-Baserba, J. Comas, and M. Poch, “Selection of industrial (food, drink and milk sector) wastewater treatment technologies: A multi-criteria assessment,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 143, pp. 180–190, 2017.
📄 Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Science, Technical guide for generation and discharging coefficient accounting of industrial pollution sources in the first national census, 2007.
📄 V. M. Correia, T. Stephenson, and S. J. Judd, “Characterisation of textile wastewaters - a review,” Environ. Technol. (United Kingdom), vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 917–929, 1994.
📄 M.J. de Wild-Scholten, E.A. Alsema, V.M. Fthenakis, G. Agostinelli, and etc. "Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases in PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULE MANUFACTURING: POTENTIAL EMISSIONS AND ABATEMENT STRATEGIES," 22nd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Fiera Milano, Italy, 3-7 September 2007.
📄 European IPPC Bureau, “Best Available Techniques. Reference Document for Common waste water and waste gas treatment/management systems in the Chemical Sector,” Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Bureau. 2016.
📄 Geng Lingfeng, Yan Haibo and etc. Research on generation and discharging coefficient of shoemaking industry in Wenling City, Environmental Pollution and Control, Vol.8, PP.55-58, 2009.
📄 G. Libralato, A. Volpi Ghirardini, and F. Avezzù, “To centralise or to decentralise: An overview of the most recent trends in wastewater treatment management,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 61–68, 2012.
📄 M. Heller, S. Garlapati, and K. Aithala, “Expert membrane system design and selection for metal finishing waste water treatment,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 341–353, 1998.
📄 S. Lim, D. Park, and J. M. Park, “Environmental and economic feasibility study of a total wastewater treatment network system,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 88, pp. 564–575, 2008.
📄 M. Mahjouri, M. B. Ishak, A. Torabian, A. M. Latifah, N. Halimoon, and J. Ghoddusi, “Optimal selection of Iron and Steel wastewater treatment technology using integrated multi-criteria decision-making techniques and fuzzy logic,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 107, pp. 54–68, 2017.
📄 Pratap, S. S., Saba, H., Paras, P., &Pinaki, S. (2022). Microbial removal of zinc by a zinc resistant bacterium: potential in industrial waste remediation. Res J ChemEnviron, 26(2).
📄 V. V Ranade and V. M. Bhandari, Industrial Wastewater Treatment, Recycling, and Reuse: An Overview. Elsevier Ltd., 2014.
📄 S. Zaharia, “Decentralized wastewater treatment systems: Efficiency and its estimated impact against onsite natural water pollution status. A Romanian case study,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 108, no. Azapagic 2003, pp. 74–88, 2017.
📄 G. Zeng, R. Jiang, G. Huang, M. Xu, and J. Li, “Optimization of wastewater treatment alternative selection by hierarchy grey relational analysis,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 250–259, 2007.
📄 WWAP, “Wastewater, the untapped The United Nations World Water Development Report 2017,” Paris, 2017.