Frontiers in Emerging Multidisciplinary Sciences

Open Access Peer Review International
Open Access

Future Teachers' Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational Settings: A Study Across Undergraduate and Master's Levels

4 Department of Teacher Education, University of Barcelona, Spain
4 Faculty of Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools, such as large language models (LLMs), presents both unprecedented opportunities and significant challenges for the educational landscape. As these technologies become increasingly accessible, understanding the perceptions of future educators is crucial for effectively integrating GenAI into pedagogical practices and curriculum design. This article explores the nuanced views of undergraduate and master's-level teacher candidates regarding the benefits, challenges, ethical implications, and preparedness for utilizing GenAI in their prospective teaching careers. Drawing upon existing literature, this conceptual study outlines a framework for examining these perceptions, hypothesizing that while future teachers recognize the potential of GenAI for personalized learning and administrative tasks, they also express concerns about academic integrity, the potential for over-reliance, and the necessity for robust training. The insights garnered from such an exploration are vital for shaping teacher education programs, developing appropriate policies, and fostering a generation of educators equipped to navigate the evolving digital learning environment.

How to Cite

Dr. Sofia Alvarez, & Dr. Raymond J. Chen. (2024). Future Teachers’ Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational Settings: A Study Across Undergraduate and Master’s Levels. Frontiers in Emerging Multidisciplinary Sciences, 1(1), 13–19. Retrieved from https://irjernet.com/index.php/fems/article/view/11

References

📄 Bonsu, E. M., & Baffour-Koduah, D. (2023). From the consumers’ side: determining students’ perception and intention to use ChatGPT in Ghanaian higher education. Journal of Education, Society & Multiculturalism, 4(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2478/jesm-2023-0001
📄 Chan, C. K. Y. (2025). Students’ perceptions of ‘AI-giarism’: investigating changes in understandings of academic misconduct. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 8087–8108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13151-7
📄 Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
📄 Chan, C. K. Y., & Tsi, L. H. Y. (2024). Will generative AI replace teachers in higher education? A study of teacher and student perceptions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, 101395. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STUEDUC.2024.101395
📄 Chan, C. K., & Zhou, W. (2023). Deconstructing student perceptions of generative AI (GenAI) through an Expectancy Value Theory (EVT)-based Instrument (2305.01186). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01186
📄 Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
📄 Dai, Y., Liu, A., & Lim, C. P. (2023). Reconceptualizing ChatGPT and generative AI as a student-driven innovation in higher education. Procedia CIRP, 119, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.05.002
📄 Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., et al. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
📄 Elkhodr, M., Gide, E., Wu, R., & Darwish, O. (2023). ICT students’ perceptions towards ChatGPT: An experimental reflective lab analysis. STEM Education, 3(2), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2023006
📄 Felten, E. W., Raj, M., & Seamans, R. (2023). How will language modelers like ChatGPT affect occupations and industries? (4375268). SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4375268
📄 Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
📄 Lozano, A., & Blanco Fontao, C. (2023). Is the education system prepared for the irruption of artificial intelligence? a study on the perceptions of students of primary education degree from a dual perspective: current pupils and future teachers. Education Sciences, 13(7), 733. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070733
📄 Miao, F., Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.
📄 Ngo, T. T. A. (2023). The perception by university students of the use of ChatGPT in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(17), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.39019
📄 Sabzalieva, E., & Valentini A. (2023). ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence in higher education: Quick start guide. UNESCO.
📄 Singh, H., Tayarani-Najaran, M. H., & Yaqoob, M. (2023). Exploring computer science students' perception of ChatGPT in higher education: A descriptive and correlation study. Education Sciences, 13(9), 924.
📄 Walczak, K., & Cellary, W. (2023). Challenges for higher education in the era of widespread access to Generative AI. Economics and Business Review, 9(2), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2023.2.743
📄 Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101..