4
Department of Strategic and Global Management Colombo International Business Academy Colombo, Sri Lanka
4
Faculty of Organizational Development South Lanka Institute of Management Galle, Sri Lanka
Abstract
Organizational innovation is increasingly shaped by how firms position and mobilize heterogeneous inventors within internal collaboration networks. This paper develops an integrated analytical framework for optimizing inventor placement across core and peripheral network positions to enhance innovation output. Drawing on knowledge-based theory, network theory, and dynamic capability perspectives, the study synthesizes insights from organizational design, absorptive capacity, and recombinant innovation literature. The core argument is that inventor location within organizational networks significantly influences the efficiency, diversity, and impact of innovation outcomes.
The study conceptualizes core positions as structurally embedded nodes with high centrality and dense connectivity, facilitating exploitation and incremental innovation, while peripheral positions serve as exploratory spaces enabling novelty generation and knowledge recombination. By integrating these dual functions, the proposed framework explains how firms can dynamically allocate inventors based on task complexity, knowledge type, and innovation objectives.
Empirical and theoretical evidence from prior studies suggests that inventor mobility, structural embeddedness, and network positioning critically determine knowledge spillovers and innovation performance (Agarwal et al., 2009). Similarly, organizational restructuring and acquisitions influence inventor integration and innovation outcomes (Ahuja & Katila, 2001). The paper further proposes a multi-layer optimization model that aligns inventor capabilities with network topology to maximize innovation efficiency.
The findings contribute to strategic management literature by bridging micro-level inventor behavior with macro-level organizational design. The framework provides actionable implications for R&D managers seeking to balance exploration and exploitation through optimized network design.
How to Cite
Perera, D. N., & Fernando, D. I. (2026). Optimizing Inventor Placement In Organizational Networks: A Framework For Assessing Core And Peripheral Contributions To Innovation Output. Frontiers in Strategic Management, 3(02), 01β09. Retrieved from https://irjernet.com/index.php/fsm/article/view/421
Agarwal, R., Ganco, M., & Ziedonis, R. H. (2009). Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: Implicationsfor knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility. Strategic Management Journal, 30(13), 1349β1374.
Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: Alongitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197β220.
Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative frameworkand review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49(4), 571β582.
Argyres, N. (1996). Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical integration decisions. Strategic Manage-ment Journal, 17(2), 129β150.
Argyres, N. S., & Silverman, B. S. (2004). R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate techno-logical knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8β9), 929β958.
Argyres, N., Rios, L. A., & Silverman, B. S. (2020). Organizational change and the dynamics of innovation: For-mal R&D structure and intrafirm inventor networks. Strategic Management Journal, 41(11), 2015β2049.
Bakir, B., Ozdemir, M., & Karim, S. (2021). Acqui-hires: Redeployment and retention of human capital post-acquisition. Strategic Management Journal, 45(2), 203β395.
Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules: The power of modularity (Vol. 1). MIT Press.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99β120.
Barsky, N. P. (1999). A core/periphery structure in a corporate budgeting process. Connect, 22(2), 22β29.
Baumann, O., Schmidt, J., & Stieglitz, N. (2019). Effective search in rugged performance landscapes: A reviewand outlook. Journal of Management, 45(1), 285β318.
Billinger, S., Srikanth, K., Stieglitz, N., & Schumacher, T. R. (2021). Exploration and exploitation in complex sea-rch tasks: How feedback influences whether and where human agents search. Strategic Management Jour-nal, 42(2), 361β385.
Billinger, S., Stieglitz, N., & Schumacher, T. R. (2014). Search on rugged landscapes: An experimental study.Organization Science, 25(1), 93β108.
Burt, R. S. (1976). Positions in networks. Social Forces, 55(1), 93β122.
Carnabuci, G., & Operti, E. (2013). Where do firms' recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizationalnetworks, knowledge, and firms' ability to innovate through technological recombination. Strategic Manage-ment Journal, 34(13), 1591β1613.
Cattani, G., & Ferriani, S. (2008). A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social net-works and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organization Science, 19(6), 824β844.
Cattani, G., Ferriani, S., & Allison, P. D. (2014). Insiders, outsiders, and the struggle for consecration in culturalfields: A core-periphery perspective. American Sociological Review, 79(2), 258β281.
Cattani, G., Ferriani, S., & Colucci, M. (2015). Creativity in social networks. In The Oxford handbook of creativeindustries (Vol. 2, pp. 75β95). Oxford University Press.
Chattopadhyay, S., & Bercovitz, J. (2020). When one door closes, another door opensβ¦ for some: Evidence fromthe post-TRIPS Indian pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 41(6), 988β1022.
Chattopadhyay, S., Karim, S., & Capron, L. (2024). Addressing the paradox of innovation-sourcing acquisitions:Unpacking the roles of firm and individual absorptive capacity. Working Paper. University of Illinois.
Chattopadhyay, S., Won, S., & Bidwell, M. (2024). Dynamic demands versus durable skills: Career dilemmas inpharmaceutical R&D. Working Paper. University of Illinois.
Coff, R. W. (1997). Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. The Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 374β402.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1991). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation.Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128β152.
Coleman, J. S., Katz, E., & Menzel, H. (1966). Medical innovation: A diffusion study. Bobbs-Merrill Company.
Csaszar, F. A., & Siggelkow, N. (2010). How much to copy? Determinants of effective imitation breadth. Organi-zation Science, 21(3), 661β676.
Csermely, P., London, A., Wu, L., & Uzzi, B. (2013). Structure and dynamics of core/periphery networks. Journalof Complex Networks, 1, 93β123.
Dahlander, L., & Frederiksen, L. (2012). The core and cosmopolitans: A relational view of innovation in usercommunities. Organization Science, 23(4), 988β1007.
Dubinsky, Y., Rubin, J., Berger, T., Duszynski, S., Becker, M., & Czarnecki, K. (2013). An exploratory study ofcloning in industrial software product lines. In 2013 17th European conference on software maintenance andreengineering (pp. 25β34). IEEE.
Ethiraj, S. K. (2007). Allocation of inventive effort in complex product systems. Strategic Management Journal,28(6), 563β584.
Ethiraj, S. K., & Levinthal, D. (2004). Bounded rationality and the search for organizational architecture: An evo-lutionary perspective on the design of organizations and their evolvability. Administrative Science Quarterly,49(3), 404β437.
Fabrizio, K. R. (2009). Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Research policy, 38(2), 255β267.
Fang, C., Lee, J., & Schilling, M. A. (2010). Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design:The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organization Science, 21(3), 625β642.
Ferriani, S., Cattani, G., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2009). The relational antecedents of project-entrepreneurship: Net-work centrality, team composition and project performance. Research Policy, 38(10), 1545β1558.
Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47(1), 117β132.
Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2001). Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data.Research Policy, 30(7), 1019β1039.
Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2004). Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management Journal,25(8β9), 909β928.
Fonti, F., & Maoret, M. (2016). The direct and indirect effects of core and peripheral social capital on organiza-tional performance. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1765β1786.
Galeotti, A., Goyal, S., & Kamphorst, J. (2006). Network formation with heterogeneous players. Games and Eco-nomic Behavior, 54(2), 353β372.
Gofman, M., & Jin, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence, education, and entrepreneurship. The Journal of Finance,79(1), 631β667.
GΓ³mez-SolΓ³rzano, M., Tortoriello, M., & Soda, G. (2019). Instrumental and affective ties within the laboratory:The impact of informal cliques on innovative productivity. Strategic Management Journal, 40(10), 1593β1609.
Graham, B. S. (2017). An econometric model of network formation with degree heterogeneity. Econometrica,85(4), 1033β1063.
Grimpe, C., & Sofka, W. (2009). Search patterns and absorptive capacity: Low-and high-technology sectors inEuropean countries. Research Policy, 38(3), 495β506.
Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizationaloutcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior 9, 369β406.
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamiccapabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 831β850.
Hess, A. M., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2011). When are assets complementary? Star scientists, strategic alliances, andinnovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 32(8), 895β909.
Heydari, B., Heydari, P., & Mosleh, M. (2015). Efficient network structures with separable heterogeneous connec-tion costs. Economics Letters, 134, 82β85.
Heydari, B., Mosleh, M., & Dalili, K. (2020). Not all bridges connect: Integration in multi-community net-works. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 44(4), 199β220.