Frontiers in Emerging Multidisciplinary Sciences

Open Access Peer Review International
Open Access

The Influence Of Technology-Enhanced Learning Activities On Vocabulary Performance Among Pre-Service Educators

4 Department of Educational Technology, University of the Philippines Diliman, Philippines
4 School of Teacher Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
4 Faculty of Education, University of Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

Vocabulary acquisition is a fundamental component of language proficiency, particularly critical for pre-service teachers who must master extensive linguistic repertoires for effective instruction. In an increasingly digitized educational landscape, the integration of technology-based activities has become a pervasive feature of modern pedagogy. This article systematically examines the impact of technology-enhanced learning activities on the vocabulary acquisition performance of pre-service teachers. Drawing upon a comprehensive review of extant literature, we investigate how various digital tools and platforms contribute to improved vocabulary learning, explore the underlying mechanisms of engagement and motivation fostered by technology, and analyze the perceptions of learners regarding these innovative approaches. The findings suggest that well-designed technology-based activities can significantly enhance vocabulary acquisition by offering interactive, personalized, and engaging learning experiences, thereby equipping future educators with robust linguistic skills essential for their professional careers.

How to Cite

Dr. Rachel T. Alvarez, Dr. Wenjie Liu, & Dr. Emily Grace Robinson. (2025). The Influence Of Technology-Enhanced Learning Activities On Vocabulary Performance Among Pre-Service Educators. Frontiers in Emerging Multidisciplinary Sciences, 2(06), 8–12. Retrieved from https://irjernet.com/index.php/fems/article/view/68

References

📄 Alqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 3(3), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.20472/TE.2015.3.3.002
📄 Arslan, K. (2024). Teaching English Vocabulary: Innovative Methods. https://doi.org/10.62601/crll.v2i1.26
📄 Arthur, Y. D., Asiedu-Addo, S., & Assuah, C. (2017). Students’ Perception and Its Impact on Ghanaian Students’ Interest in Mathematics: Multivariate Statistical Analytical Approach. Asian Research Journal of Mathematics, 4(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.9734/ARJOM/2017/33023
📄 Atteh, E., Boadi, A., & Amoah, E. (2023). Incorporation of Technology in the Mathematics Classroom: A Review of its Extent in Ghana’s Educational Landscape. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 17(12), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2023/v17i12588
📄 Aysu, S. (2022). The role of learner autonomy on vocabulary learning. RumeliDE Dil Ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi(31), 1534-1545. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1222355
📄 Balmes, S. R. (2022). Technology Integration and Transformative Innovation in Education. International Journal of Research Publications, 106(1). https://doi.org/10.47119/ijrp1001061820223743
📄 Brantmeier, C. (2003). Technology and the Individual: Pupils in Control of Advanced Second Language Acquisition. Emerging Technologies in Teaching Languages and Culture.
📄 Chong, L. D. (2005). Second Language Acquisition: Selected Readings: Learner-Centered Language Acquisition through CALL Environment. Selangor: Sasbadi Sdn. Bhd.
📄 Gyan R.K, Ayiku F, Atteh E, Adams A.K. (2021). The effect of Constructivism on Students’ Performance in Solving Mathematical Problems under Trigonometry. Asian J Educ Soc Stud.19(2):1-18.
📄 Harmon, J. M., Wood, K. D., & Keser, K. (2009). Promoting vocabulary learning with interactive word wall. Middle School Journal, 40(3), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2009.11495588
📄 Huszti, I. I., & Barta, K. A. (2024). Methods of teaching foreign language vocabulary online. Збірник Наукових Праць. https://doi.org/10.59694/ped_sciences.2024.09.066
📄 Kung & Chuo (2002). Students' perceptions of English learning through ESL/EFL websites. TESL-EJ, 6(1). Available at: http://writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej21/a2.html#Append
📄 Lightbrown, P.M. & Spada, N. (2006). How Languages are Learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
📄 Lin, C. C., Chan, H. J., & Hsiao, H. S. (2011). EFL students’ perceptions of learning vocabulary in a computer supported collaborative environment. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 91-99.
📄 Linse, C. T., & Nunan, D. (Ed.). (2005). Practical English Language Teaching: Young learners. New York: McGraw-Hill ESL/ELT.
📄 Mohammad G. S., Abdel-Haq M. E. & Al-Hadi M. T. (2018). Using Authentic Materials for Developing Vocabulary Acquisition among EFL Students. Journal of Faculty of Education. No. (116), Part (4). 171-197. doi: 10.12816/JFEB.2018.62427
📄 Mohd Khairul Affendy Bin Ahmad. (2018). ESL learners’ attitude and motivation towards using web-Based activities to learn English language vocabulary. Thesis submitted to Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
📄 Nakata, T. (2015). Effects of feedback timing on second language vocabulary learning: Does delaying feedback increase learning? Language Teaching Research, 19(4), 416-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541721
📄 Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps toward understanding the next generation. Educating the next generation, 2(1-2), 20.
📄 Ramasany V., Noor M. N & Zaid M. N, (2022). Effects of learning using edpuzzle interactive video application on students' interest, engagement and achievement in science subjects, Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal, Vol. 6 No. 2:59 –72.
📄 Shanks J, Miller L, Rosendale S. (2012). Action research in a professional development school setting to support teacher candidate self-efficacy. SRATE J. 21(2): 26-32.
📄 Sohib o‘g‘li, E. R., & Bustanov, K. (2024). Balancing tradition and technology: a comparative study on vocabulary acquisition in intermediate english learners. American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research, 4(10), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/volume04issue10-03
📄 Tabasi, Y., Tondowala, I. B., Tupamahu, M. S., Soa’e Sigilipu, F. P., & Septiana, K. A. K. (2024). The Effectiveness of Technology-Enhanced Learning Tools in English Language Education. Journal on Education, 6(4), 21589–21601. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i4.6308
📄 Vigdor, J. L., Ladd, H. F., & Martinez, E. (2014). Scaling the digital divide: Home computer technology and student achievement. Economic Inquiry, 52(3), 1103-1119. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12089
📄 Wong, W. L. H. (2015). A Study of Language Learning Style and Teaching Style Preferences of Hong Kong Community College Pupils and Teachers in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Contexts. School of Teacher Education: University of Canterbury.
📄 Yu-han, M., & Lin, W.Y. (2015). A Study on the Relationship between English Reading Comprehension and English Vocabulary Knowledge. Education Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/209154
📄 Yunus M. M. & Suliman A. (2014). Information & Communication Technology (ICT) Tools in Teaching and Learning Literature Component in Malaysian Secondary Schools. Asian Social Science; Vol. 10, No. 7. 136-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n7p136