Frontiers in Emerging Multidisciplinary Sciences

Open Access Peer Review International
Open Access

Intelligent Agent-Based Control Structures for Automatic Failure Repair in Remote Computing Environments with Improved Stability

4 Nusantara Institute of Digital Technology (NIDT), Jakarta, Indonesia
4 Indonesian Center for Advanced Computing Research (ICACR), Bandung, Indonesia
4 Archipelago Institute of Technology and Innovation (AITI), Surabaya, Indonesia

Abstract

Remote computing environments, including distributed cloud infrastructures and geographically dispersed cyber-physical systems, are increasingly exposed to complex failure modes driven by extreme environmental disturbances, cascading dependencies, and high system heterogeneity. Traditional fault management approaches rely on static rule-based recovery mechanisms, which are insufficient for ensuring stability under dynamic and uncertain operational conditions. This paper proposes an intelligent agent-based control architecture for automatic failure repair that integrates resilience engineering principles with adaptive decision-making models to enhance system stability and recovery efficiency.

The proposed framework models failure repair as a sequential decision process in which autonomous agents continuously monitor system states, evaluate fault severity, and execute corrective actions based on learned policies. The conceptual foundation is derived from resilience quantification methods in power systems (Stanković et al., 2023; Bhusal et al., 2020) and fragility modeling techniques used to assess structural vulnerability under extreme disturbances (Zhu & Ou, 2025). These approaches are extended to remote computing environments through agent-based coordination and adaptive control structures.

The system further incorporates psychological resilience constructs, such as cognitive flexibility and emotion regulation capacity (Dennis & Vander Wal, 2010; Gratz & Roemer, 2004), to conceptually model adaptive decision robustness in computational agents. Reinforcement learning-inspired adaptation mechanisms allow the system to improve recovery strategies over time based on feedback signals.

Experimental conceptual analysis indicates that the proposed architecture significantly improves fault isolation accuracy, reduces mean recovery time, and enhances system stability under cascading failure conditions. The integration of graph-based vulnerability assessment and resilience-driven control policies ensures that system-level disruptions are mitigated proactively rather than reactively.

The study contributes a unified theoretical framework for intelligent autonomous repair systems, bridging resilience engineering, agent-based modeling, and adaptive decision theory. It provides a foundation for next-generation self-healing remote computing infrastructures capable of maintaining stability under highly volatile conditions.

How to Cite

Dr. Rafiq Pranata, Dr. Ayu Wulandari, & Dr. Bima Santoso. (2025). Intelligent Agent-Based Control Structures for Automatic Failure Repair in Remote Computing Environments with Improved Stability. Frontiers in Emerging Multidisciplinary Sciences, 2(10), 15–21. Retrieved from https://irjernet.com/index.php/fems/article/view/325

References

📄 K. Gupta and K. Verma, ‘ MCS-ML based line vulnerability for infrastructural resilience assessment with multi-wind speed cyclonic zones ’, Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 119, p. 109575, Nov. 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109575.
📄 M. Stanković et al., ‘Methods for Analysis and Quantification of Power System Resilience’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 4774–4787, Sep. 2023, DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3212688.
📄 E. H. Fischer and A. Farina. Attitudes toward seeking professional psychologial help: A shortened form and considerations for research. Journal of college student development, 1995.
📄 J. P. Dennis and J. S. Vander Wal. The cognitive flexibility inventory: Instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive therapy and research, 34: 241–253, 2010.
📄 K. Kroenke, R. L. Spitzer, and J. B. Williams. The phq-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of general internal medicine, 16 (9): 606–613, 2001.
📄 K. L. Gratz and L. Roemer. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment, 26: 41–54, 2004.
📄 K. M. Connor and J. R. Davidson. Development of a new resilience scale: The connor-davidson resilience scale (cd-risc). Depression and anxiety, 18 (2): 76–82, 2003.
📄 Laheri, R. (2025). Self-Healing infrastructure: leveraging reinforcement learning for autonomous cloud recovery and enhanced resilience. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 10(49s), 352–357. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i49s.9888
📄 M. Mitrevsi. Developing Conversational Interfaces for IOS: Add Responsive Voice Control to Your Apps. Springer, 2018.
📄 N. Bhusal, M. Abdelmalak, M. Kamruzzaman, and M. Benidris, ‘ Power System Rsilience: Current Practices, Challenges, and Future Directions ’, IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 18064–18086, 2020, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968586.
📄 N. Zhao et al., ‘ Full-time scale resilience enhancement framework for power transmission system under ice disasters ’, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 126, p. 106609, Mar. 2021, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106609.
📄 S. Parsons and P. Mitchell. The potential of virtual reality in social skills training for people with autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of intellectual disability research, 46 (5): 430–443, 2002.
📄 X. Lian, T. Qian, Z. Li, X. Chen, and W. Tang, ‘ Resilience assessment for power system based on cascading failure graph under disturbances caused by extreme weather events’, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 145, p. 108616, Feb. 2023, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108616.
📄 X. Zhu and G. Ou, ‘ Wind fragility modeling of transmission tower-line system based on threat-dependent structural robustness index ’, Struct. Saf., vol. 114, p. 102571, May 2025, DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2024.102571.2