4
Department of Public Health Barbados Medical Sciences Institute Bridgetown, Barbados
4
Faculty of Internal Medicine West Indies Clinical University Speightstown, Barbados
Abstract
The increasing global demand for renewable and sustainable energy technologies has intensified research into advanced photovoltaic systems capable of overcoming the efficiency and stability limitations of conventional silicon-based solar cells. Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have emerged as a promising third-generation photovoltaic technology due to their low production cost, flexibility, environmental compatibility, and capability to operate under low-light conditions. However, conventional DSSCs still encounter critical limitations associated with charge recombination, electrode instability, low electron mobility, and limited energy conversion efficiency. This research and review article presents a comprehensive analytical framework focused on advanced energy harvesting using graphene-based electrodes within dye-sensitized solar cell systems. The study critically examines the operational principles, structural configurations, charge transport mechanisms, and material interactions influencing DSSC performance. Particular emphasis is placed on the integration of graphene and graphene-derived nanostructures as conductive electrode materials to enhance photovoltaic efficiency, electron transport kinetics, and long-term operational stability. The review synthesizes existing literature concerning quantum dot sensitization, natural pigment sensitizers, nanophotonic enhancement, ShockleyâQueisser efficiency considerations, and second-generation luminescent concentrator mechanisms. Furthermore, the article develops a theoretical framework linking graphene conductivity, optical transparency, catalytic behavior, and interfacial engineering with energy harvesting optimization. The findings indicate that graphene-based electrodes significantly improve charge transfer resistance, enhance light absorption efficiency, and contribute to improved thermal and electrochemical stability in DSSC architectures. The paper concludes that graphene-enabled DSSC systems represent a viable pathway toward scalable, low-cost, and environmentally sustainable photovoltaic technologies suitable for future smart energy infrastructures.
How to Cite
Clarke, D. R., & Browne, D. A. (2026). Advanced Energy Harvesting Framework Using Graphene-Based Electrodes In Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Systems. Frontiers in Emerging Computer Science and Information Technology, 3(02), 29â36. Retrieved from https://irjernet.com/index.php/fecsit/article/view/405
J. Albero, J. N. Clifford, and E. Palomares, âQuantum dot based molecular solar cellsâ, Coord. Chem. Rev., vol. 263, pp. 53â64, 2014.
S. Ananthakumar, D. Balaji, J. Ram Kumar, and S. Moorthy Babu, âRole of co-sensitization in dye-sensitized and quantum dot-sensitized solar cellsâ, SN Appl. Sci., vol. 1, pp. 1â46, 2019.
D. M. Bagnall and M. Boreland, âPhotovoltaic technologiesâ, Energy Policy, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 4390â4396, 2008.
W. A. Badawy, âA review on solar cells from Si-single crystals to porous materials and quantum dotsâ, J. Adv. Res., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 123â132, 2015.
E. T. Bekele and Y. D. Sintayehu, âRecent Progress, Advancements, and Efficiency Improvement Techniques of Natural Plant Pigment-Based Photosensitizers for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cellsâ, J. Nanomater., vol. 2022, 2022.
S. V. Boriskina and G. Chen, âExceeding the solar cell ShockleyâQueisser limit via thermal up-conversion of low-energy photonsâ, Opt. Commun., vol. 314, pp. 71â78, 2014.
D. J. Farrell and M. Yoshida, âOperating regimes for second generation luminescent solar concentratorsâ, Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 93â99, 2012.
J. Gong, J. Liang, and K. Sumathy, âReview on dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs): Fundamental concepts and novel materialsâ, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 5848â5860, 2012.
Y. Gong et al., âAg incorporation with controlled grain growth enables 12.5% efficient kesterite solar cell with open circuit voltage reached 64.2% ShockleyâQueisser limitâ, Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 31, no. 24, p. 2101927, 2021.
J.-F. Guillemoles, T. Kirchartz, D. Cahen, and U. Rau, âGuide for the perplexed to the ShockleyâQueisser model for solar cellsâ, Nat. Photonics, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 501â505, 2019.
K. E. Jasim, âDye sensitized solar cells-working principles, challenges and opportunitiesâ, Sol. Cells-Dye-Sensitized Devices, vol. 8, p. 172Ä210, 2011.
N. Kant and P. Singh, âReview of next generation photovoltaic solar cell technology and comparative materialistic developmentâ, Mater. Today Proc., vol. 56, pp. 3460â3470, 2022.
S. Karthick, K. Hemalatha, S. K. Balasingam, F. Manik Clinton, S. Akshaya, and H. Kim, âDyeâsensitized solar cells: history, components, configuration, and working principleâ, Interfacial Eng. Funct. Mater. Dye. Sol. Cells, pp. 1â16, 2019.
A. Khatibi, F. Razi Astaraei, and M. H. Ahmadi, âGeneration and combination of the solar cells: A current model reviewâ, Energy Sci. Eng., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 305â322, 2019.
S. A. Mann, R. R. Grote, R. M. Osgood Jr, A. Alu, and E. C. Garnett, âOpportunities and limitations for nanophotonic structures to exceed the ShockleyâQueisser limitâ, ACS Nano, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 8620â8631, 2016.
T. Markvart, âFrom steam engine to solar cells: can thermodynamics guide the development of future generations of photovoltaics?â, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 543â569, 2016.
O. D. Miller, E. Yablonovitch, and S. R. Kurtz, âStrong internal and external luminescence as solar cells approach the ShockleyâQueisser limitâ, IEEE J. Photovolt., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 303â311, 2012.
R. Miles, K. Hynes, and I. Forbes, âPhotovoltaic solar cells: An overview of state-of-the-art cell development and environmental issuesâ, Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. Mater., vol. 51, no. 1â3, pp. 1â42, 2005.
R. Ranveer, B. K. Sakhale, and U. Annapure, âMicroencapsulation of Natural Pigmentsâ, Nov. Process. Methods Plant-Based Health Foods Extr. Encapsulation Health Benefits Bioact. Compd., p. 163, 2023.
P. G. V. Sampaio and M. O. A. GonzĂĄlez, âA review on organic photovoltaic cellâ, Int. J. Energy Res., vol. 46, no. 13, pp. 17813â17828, 2022.
A. Sarkar, P. Chatterjee, and A. K. Chakraborty, âSulfides and selenides as electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cellsâ, in Sulfide and Selenide Based Materials for Emerging Applications, Elsevier, 2022, pp. 243â267.
K. Sharma, V. Sharma, and S. S. Sharma, âDye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Fundamentals and Current Statusâ, Nanoscale Res. Lett., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 381, Nov. 2018.
S. Sharma, K. K. Jain, and A. Sharma, âSolar cells: in research and applicationsâa reviewâ, Mater. Sci. Appl., vol. 6, no. 12, p. 1145, 2015.
B. Srinivas, S. Balaji, M. Nagendra Babu, and Y. Reddy, âReview on present and advance materials for solar cellsâ, Int. J. Eng. Res.-Online, vol. 3, pp. 178â182, 2015.
O. Vigil-GalĂĄn et al., âRoute towards low cost-high efficiency second generation solar cells: current status and perspectivesâ, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron., vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 5562â5573, 2015.
P. Wurfel, Physics of solar cells. Wiley-Vch, 2005.
Y. Xu, T. Gong, and J. N. Munday, âThe generalized Shockley-Queisser limit for nanostructured solar cellsâ, Sci. Rep., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1â9, 2015.
Y. Xu, T. Gong, and J. N. Munday, âThe generalized Shockley-Queisser limit for nanostructured solar cellsâ, Sci. Rep., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 13536, 2015.
J. Yan and B. R. Saunders, âThird-generation solar cells: a review and comparison of polymer: fullerene, hybrid polymer and perovskite solar cellsâ, Rsc Adv., vol. 4, no. 82, pp. 43286â43314, 2014.