Machine Learning for Predicting Treatment Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Receiving Rituximab: A DAS28-Based Approach
Abstract
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a chronic, debilitating autoimmune disease characterized by chronic inflammation of the joints, leading to progressive joint damage and functional disability [1], [2]. Despite significant advancements in pharmacological therapies, including conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and biological DMARDs (bDMARDs), not all patients achieve remission or low disease activity [3], [4]. Rituximab, a B-cell depleting agent, represents a crucial bDMARD option for patients with RA, particularly those who have responded inadequately to other therapies [5]. However, response to rituximab is heterogeneous, and predicting which patients will benefit most remains a significant challenge, leading to empirical treatment choices, potential side effects, and delayed access to effective therapy for non-responders [7], [9]. The Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) is a widely accepted composite measure for assessing RA disease activity and treatment response [26], [27]. This article investigates the application of various machine learning (ML) approaches to predict the DAS28 score after rituximab treatment in RA patients, leveraging a comprehensive set of clinical and genetic variables. By analyzing complex interactions within patient data, ML models offer the potential to identify subtle patterns indicative of future treatment response, thereby facilitating personalized medicine and optimizing therapeutic strategies. Our methodology involved collecting pre-treatment patient characteristics, including demographics, disease activity markers, prior treatment history, and relevant genetic polymorphisms. Several ML algorithms were trained and evaluated to predict DAS28 scores at specific post-treatment time points. The results highlight the superior predictive capabilities of ML models compared to traditional clinical prognostication, offering a promising tool for clinicians to make more informed treatment decisions, improve patient outcomes, and reduce healthcare costs by avoiding ineffective therapies.
References
Radu AF, Bungau SG. Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Overview. Cells 2021;10:2857.
Guo Q, Wang Y, Xu D, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis: pathological mechanisms and modern pharmacologic therapies. Bone Res 2018;6:15.
Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bergstra SA, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2023;82:3-18.
Mysler E, Caubet M, Lizarraga A. Current and Emerging DMARDs for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Open Access Rheumatol 2021;13:139-52.
Pierreisnard A, Issa N, Barnetche T, et al. Meta-analysis of clinical and radiological efficacy of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis patients naive or inadequately responsive to methotrexate. Joint Bone Spine 2013;80:386-92.
Combe B, Rincheval N, Benessiano J, et al. Five-year favorable outcome of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis in the 2000s: data from the ESPOIR cohort. J Rheumatol 2013;40:1650-7.
Novella-Navarro M, Plasencia C, Tornero C, et al. Clinical predictors of multiple failure to biological therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2020;22:284.
Khader Y, Beran A, Ghazaleh S, et al. Predictors of remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biologics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rheumatol 2022;41:3615-27.
Wijbrandts CA, Tak PP. Prediction of Response to Targeted Treatment in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Mayo Clin Proc 2017;92:1129-43.
Cordisco AJ, Olave M, George MD, et al. Identifying Factors Associated With Treatment Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials. ACR Open Rheumatol 2022;4:811-8.
Couderc M, Mathieu S, Pereira B, et al. Predictive factors of rituximab response in rheumatoid arthritis: results from a French university hospital. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2013;65:648-52.
Łosińska K, Wilk M, Pripp AH, et al. Long-term drug effectiveness and survival for reference rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis patients in an ordinary outpatient clinic. Sci Rep 2022;12:8283.
Mihajloska E, Dimkovski A, Grozdanova A, et al. Early predictive factors in routine clinical practice for rituximab therapy response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Reumatologia 2024;62:150-6.
Jiménez Morales A, Maldonado-Montoro M, Martínez de la Plata JE, et al. FCGR2A/FCGR3A Gene Polymorphisms and Clinical Variables as Predictors of Response to Tocilizumab and Rituximab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Clin Pharmacol 2019;59:517-31.
Pál I, Szamosi S, Hodosi K, et al. Effect of Fcγ-receptor 3a (FCGR3A) gene polymorphisms on rituximab therapy in Hungarian patients with rheumatoid arthritis. RMD Open 2017;3:e000485.
Ruyssen-Witrand A, Rouanet S, Combe B, et al. Fcγ receptor type IIIA polymorphism influences treatment outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with rituximab. Ann Rheum Dis 2012;71:875-7.
Quartuccio L, Fabris M, Pontarini E, et al. The 158VV Fcgamma receptor 3A genotype is associated with response to rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: results of an Italian multicentre study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:716-21.
Robinson JI, Md Yusof MY, Davies V, et al. Comprehensive genetic and functional analyses of Fc gamma receptors influence on response to rituximab therapy for autoimmunity. EBioMedicine 2022;86:104343.
Kedra J, Radstake T, Pandit A, et al. Current status of use of big data and artificial intelligence in RMDs: a systematic literature review informing EULAR recommendations. RMD Open 2019;5:e001004.
Lee S, Kang S, Eun Y, et al. Machine learning-based prediction model for responses of bDMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Res Ther 2021;23:254.
Sidey-Gibbons JAM, Sidey-Gibbons CJ. Machine learning in medicine: a practical introduction. BMC Med Res Methodol 2019;19:64.
Turki T, Wang JTL. Clinical intelligence: New machine learning techniques for predicting clinical drug response. Comput Biol Med 2019;107:302-22.
Guan Y, Zhang H, Quang D, et al. Machine Learning to Predict Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Drug Responses of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients by Integrating Clinical and Genetic Markers. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71:1987-96.
Sutcliffe M, Radley G, Barton A. Personalized medicine in rheumatic diseases: how close are we to being able to use genetic biomarkers to predict response to TNF inhibitors? Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2020;16:389-96.
Bouget V, Duquesne J, Hassler S, et al. Machine learning predicts response to TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: results on the ESPOIR and ABIRISK cohorts. RMD Open 2022;8:e002442.
Kay J, Upchurch KS. ACR/EULAR 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;51:vi5-9.
Fransen J, van Riel PL. The Disease Activity Score and the EULAR response criteria. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005;23:S93-9.
Koo BS, Eun S, Shin K, et al. Machine learning model for identifying important clinical features for predicting remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologics. Arthritis Res Ther 2021;23:178.
Ukalovic D, Leeb BF, Rintelen B, et al. Prediction of ineffectiveness of biological drugs using machine learning and explainable AI methods: data from the Austrian Biological Registry BioReg. Arthritis Res Ther 2024;26:44.
Duong SQ, Crowson CS, Athreya A, et al. Clinical predictors of response to methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a machine learning approach using clinical trial data. Arthritis Res Ther 2022;24:162.
Salehi F, Lopera Gonzalez LI, Bayat S, et al. Machine Learning Prediction of Treatment Response to Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Clin Med 2024;13:3890.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Sophia Nguyen, Michael Hughes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their articles published in this journal. All articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited.